Yanomamo Rules Regarding Killing vs. Western Rules
1. In Yanomamo culture, rules regarding killing are deeply intertwined with their social and political structures. Unlike Western cultures, where the state enforces laws against killing and administers justice through formal legal systems, the Yanomamo have more decentralized and kinship-based methods of handling such matters. When a killing occurs among the Yanomamo, it often leads to cycles of revenge killings rather than state-imposed punishment.
2. Revenge Killings in Yanomamo Populations：
Revenge killings among the Yanomamo are a common form of conflict resolution. If a member of one group is killed by another, the kin of the deceased will seek revenge by killing someone from the offending group. This cycle of revenge can continue over generations, perpetuating violence between groups.
3. Benefits of Obtaining Unokais Status
Unokais gain higher social standing and respect within the community. Unokais have better chances of securing marriages, often with multiple wives, enhancing their reproductive success.Unokais can hold more sway in community decisions and leadership roles.
In contrast, non-unokais, those who have not participated in revenge killings, may lead safer lives but lack the same level of prestige and influence. The choice to become an unokais is often driven by the desire for higher status, greater marriage prospects, and increased political power.
4. Relationship Between Revenge Killings and Yanomamo Culture
Revenge killings reinforce the decentralized political structure, where power is often held by those who can demonstrate bravery and strength, such as unokais.
Social hierarchy is influenced by one's participation in revenge killings. Unokais occupy higher positions, and their actions help define social norms and expectations.
Kinship ties are crucial in revenge killings. The responsibility to avenge a killing typically falls on close kin, strengthening family bonds but also perpetuating cycles of violence.
Unokais have greater reproductive success due to their enhanced social status. They are more likely to attract multiple wives, which increases their chances of having more offspring.
5.Laws against killing, even though killing is generally seen as a universally negative act, are essential because:They serve as a deterrent, discouraging people from committing acts of violence due to fear of punishment.They help maintain social order by providing a formal mechanism for justice, reducing the likelihood of ongoing cycles of revenge.They reflect and enforce societal moral standards, promoting a culture of respect for human life.
This was posted late for half-credit. Make sure you pay attention to those deadlines. If your comments are on time, they will receive full credit.
ReplyDelete_________________________________________________
1. Okay, but the Yanomamo is a "culture" not a "state", so would we expect them to have the same type of justice system? If we were a smaller population, would we have a "state" system, or one more similar to the Yanomamo? The differences you see may not all be due to difference in culture, but just the side effects of being a smaller vs. a larger population.
A "comparison" also allows you to look for similarities. Can you find any here? Don't we both designate which killings are "acceptable" and "unacceptable" and punish the latter?
2. This is a very complex system and could have been explained more fully. Who can take part? Who are excused? What role do women play? Are there any ceremonial aspects?
3. Good.
4. Would have liked these expanded, but your responses are on point.
Political structure: Good.
Social status/organization: What about women? Can this system influence their social status?
Kinship: That's how kinship influences revenge killings. What about the other way around? This system of killings works to give high status unokais a larger system of kin, through marriage, tying the population together. From the other perspective, kinship determines who are expected to kill and who they can kill.
Marriage and reproduction: Good.
5. You aren't actually answering the key question here: If killing is recognized to be socially/morally bad, why do we need laws against it? Shouldn't people just not kill? The point here is to recognize that there is killing in all cultures, including both the Yanomamo and Western societies. Both cultures have systems of dealing with it. But the question remains... why do people kill if this behavior is so universally recognized as "bad"?
Both Western cultures and the Yanomamo have laws against these behaviors, not because they are bad but because people may gain some benefit from engaging in those laws to the detriment of those around them.
We are creatures of biology, regardless of how "civilized" we might want to think we are. Killing can benefit an organism if they gain resources or a mate or defend their offspring in the process, correct? So that benefit is still there in humans, whether we like it or not. Killing is an instinctive, biological reaction to a threat of some sort, to our lives, to our family (genes) or to our resources, but it can also be a strategy to advance your survival, such as (for example) killing off a rival. Understand that this isn't excusing the behavior. It just explains it. But we need laws against this behavior, not because no one wants to do it but because sometimes people can benefit from this behavior... i.e., they DO want to kill because it benefits them. Laws protect us from selfish actions of others, acting to their own benefit and the harm of others.