Part 1:
Initially, I would find it challenging to communicate without relying on spoken words or written text. My natural inclination would be to use speech or writing to express myself clearly and effectively. However, faced with the constraint, I would likely start exploring alternative ways to communicate. For my partner, communicating with me under these conditions likely involves adapting their approach significantly. Since they cannot use speech, writing, or ASL, they may resort to non-verbal cues, gestures, or other creative means to try to convey meaning effectively.
In this experiment, the "non-speaker" arguably possesses more power because they have more flexibility in how they attempt to communicate. They can use gestures, facial expressions, and other non-verbal cues that may help convey their messages more effectively. As the "speaker" , I am limited to text-based responses, which can sometimes be more rigid and may not capture the full nuance of non-verbal communication.
If we imagine my partner and I representing two different cultures meeting for the first time, the advantage in communicating complex ideas within their own population would likely lie with the culture that uses symbolic language . The speaking culture might view the non-speaking culture with curiosity or even find it challenging to fully understand and relate to their communication methods.
Part 2:
Yes, I can last for the full 15 minutes communicating only through speech. The difficulty in this experiment lies in conveying emotions, emphasis, and certain nuances that are typically expressed through body language. Without physical embellishments, the conversation may feel more sterile or lacking in warmth and subtlety.
For my partner, engaging in a conversation without body language might feel somewhat awkward or incomplete. They may miss the additional layer of communication that body language provides, which can make interactions more engaging and intuitive.
Non-speech language techniques, such as body language, play a crucial role in effective communication. They help convey emotions, emphasize certain points, and provide context to spoken words. When body language does not match spoken language, it can create confusion or misinterpretation, highlighting the function of body language as a complement to verbal communication.
Yes, there are people who have difficulty reading body language, which can be due to various reasons such as neurodivergence or cultural differences. In environments where verbal communication is challenging or unreliable, not reading body language might be beneficial, such as in highly structured or formal settings where verbal clarity is prioritized.
Part 3:
Using written language would likely make the experiment easier because it allows for more detailed and precise communication compared to speech alone. Written language provides a permanent record, allows for reflection, and enables complex ideas to be conveyed with clarity and depth.
Written language provides the advantage of preserving knowledge across time and space. It allows for the development of complex societies, legal systems, science, and culture by enabling detailed communication, record-keeping, and dissemination of ideas beyond immediate interactions.
Written language has had a profound impact on globalization by facilitating the spread of ideas, information, and culture across vast distances and diverse populations. It has accelerated the exchange of knowledge and enabled the formation of interconnected global networks that transcend cultural barriers.
Hello Simin, I'm curious to see if you also had issues in having to re-explain yourself during the first experiment while using your hand gestures. During my second experiment, me and my partner also felt like something was missing. I also didn't realize how much hand gestures and body language plays a big role in communicating. I liked how you stated that written communication preserves knowledge across time and space. We use written language in our daily lives without realizing how much we have to read and write.
ReplyDeleteHi Simin,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your post. I enjoyed the format you used, it made it very easy for it to read and follow along. I found your part 1 the most interesting on the perspective you observed from the "speaker" and the "non-speaker". I personally had the opposite reaction, I thought the speaker held the most power due to having the advantage of more variety of communication. Corresponding to your part 2, I also observed how facial gestures and body language has as much as an impact on the conversation just as much as vocal communication.
My comments keep disappearing. I recorded your original post as on time. I noted posted comments. Now I will leave my feedback.
ReplyDeletePart 1: In your first paragraph, you explain the experiment instead of describing what happened when you conducted the experiment. I wanted to know what happened when you tried to communicate without symbolic language.
In your second section, you have it backwards. The "speaker" has more flexibiliity because they aren't limited at all in their communications. They can speak AND use body language. The non-speaker can only use body language.
And while that contributes to the power/control issue, it is the *use* of these options that creates the power. With spoken language, the "speaker" can ask questions, change topics, argue logically, and explain why they disagree. The non-speaker lacks those abilities and therefore can't control or direct the conversation. The power lies with the "speaker".
While I agree with your conclusion regarding communicating "complex ideas", you don't explain your reasoning. Why do you think this is true?
Missing a response to the final question regarding a real-life example that mirrors this experiment. To find a real life example of this experiment, we need to find a situation where you have a speaking population and another group that doesn't speak that language, and this results in a power differential, with the speaking culture having power over the non-speaking. We see that in the interaction between English speakers and non-English speaking immigrant populations. Think about how non-English speaking immigrants are treated in Southern California? Are they treated as equals?
Part 2: Again, you don't actually describe how the experiment proceeded. You state facts but not description.
"For my partner, engaging in a conversation without body language might feel somewhat awkward or incomplete."
"Might"? Or "did"? It sounds like you are guessing instead of discussing an experiment that actually happened. Did you conduct the experiment as required? Your answers in part 1 and here in part 2 suggest that you didn't actually engage in the two conversations.
"When body language does not match spoken language, it can create confusion or misinterpretation"
Actually, when body language does not match spoken language, this tells the listener that the speaker is lying. That's not "confusing". That's very clear. Humans tend to use body language as a type of lie detector. If spoken words don't match with the body language, we are more inclined to believe the body language and doubt the words. Think about how being able to detect liars might help an individual's ability to survive and reproduce.
"...due to various reasons such as neurodivergence or cultural differences. "
Can you be more specific? What about those in the autism spectrum? One of the defining characteristics of autism is the inability to read body cues, which is why they have so much difficult in social situations, particularly with sarcasm and jokes.
Body language doesn't negatively impact "verbal clarity". In fact, it can *clarify* and *expand upon* the spoken word, so this doesn't explain why it would be best to avoid body language. For this last question, think about a situation where body language might mislead you, not because someone is lying to you but because you don't understand their system of body language. When might body language of others mislead you and it would be better to ignore it? Do all cultures use the same system of body language? They all use different systems of spoken/written language, so why would we assume their body language isn't different? If you travel to another country, can you trust the information you get from their body language?
Part 3: Very good responses for this last section and all three prompts.